The price is assigned a score of 7. At £50,000, the property seems reasonably priced considering it’s being marketed to investors with tenants in situ (£6300 annual rental income). However, without accurate square footage information, a conclusive valuation is difficult. The comparison to other nearby properties is affected by the lack of consistent square footage data in the provided dataset, hindering a truly comparative analysis.

The property’s condition receives a score of 5. Based on the photos, the property appears habitable but requires some cosmetic improvements and updates. While the kitchen and bathroom seem functional, the walls show some minor damage (e.g., peeling paint). The overall impression is that the property is in fair condition but not in excellent shape. It isn’t dilapidated, but it isn’t luxurious either.

The property’s location scores a moderate 4 due to its proximity to several amenities. While nearby schools like The Venn Boulevard Centre (Outstanding Ofsted rating) are within walking distance, the area’s overall character and desirability are not explicitly stated, requiring further investigation. The presence of nearby train stations (Hull, New Holland etc.) improves the location score. However, the lack of specific information about local shops, green spaces, and the overall neighbourhood feel necessitates a conservative score.

A score of 3 is given for the land. The property appears to have a small, unkempt garden, visible in the provided photographs. This small outdoor space does not compare with larger garden areas commonly found in some properties.