The listed price of £285,000 is comparable to other properties on Camberwell Way. Without precise square footage data for comparables, a definitive price-per-square-foot analysis is impossible. However, considering the size of the house (1184 sq ft), four bedrooms, and its apparent condition (some modernization but requiring some cosmetic updates), the price appears to be within a reasonable range for the area, although potentially slightly on the higher end considering some areas of required renovation. Therefore, a score of 7 reflects the price being competitive within the context of the surrounding houses but possibly not exceptionally good value.

Based on the provided photos, the property appears to be in generally good condition. The exterior shows recent cladding and what seems to be a well-maintained garden. While some internal rooms show signs of being lived in (clutter, children’s toys), there’s no obvious indication of significant repairs needed. The kitchen appears to have been recently modernized, which offsets the slightly less updated condition in some other rooms. There’s no indication of damp or structural issues. A score of 6 reflects a reasonable level of maintenance and some cosmetic updates needed.

The property is situated in Royton North, Oldham, which benefits from proximity to several primary schools with good Ofsted ratings (St Paul’s Cofe Primary School, Thorp Primary School) and secondary schools (The Oldham Academy North). Train stations are within a reasonable distance, providing access to Manchester and other areas. While not in the heart of a bustling city centre, the presence of nearby shops (though not specified) and schools indicates a relatively convenient location for families. The average house prices on nearby streets such as Cheviot Avenue suggest a desirable area, but without more precise details on local amenities and the character of Camberwell Way itself, a score of 7 is appropriate.

The property includes a garden, which is a positive feature. However, the plot size is listed as 0.00 SQFT, which is unlikely to be accurate. Judging from the photographs, the garden appears to be of a modest size, suitable for family use but not exceptionally large. Thus a score of 4 reflects a garden present but not extensive.