The asking price of £400,000 is given a score of 5. Considering the property’s condition and the need for complete refurbishment, the price seems high. While comparable properties in the immediate area have lower prices (e.g., properties on Penman Place), these are different property types. Without knowing the size of this property it is hard to compare against similar properties. The lack of comparable sales data (particularly those with similar condition and size) makes determining the precise value challenging. The property’s locally listed status may inflate its value, but its current condition significantly detracts.

The property’s condition receives a score of 3. The photographs clearly show a dilapidated building in need of significant renovation or demolition. The exterior shows signs of disrepair, including broken windows and graffiti, indicating a substantial amount of work is needed.

The property’s location scores a 4 due to its proximity to several primary schools with good Ofsted ratings (Waterville Primary and Spring Gardens Primary). However, the lack of detailed information on nearby amenities and transportation negatively impacts the score. The riverside location could be seen as attractive to some, but the surrounding area appears somewhat isolated based on the provided images.

A score of 2 is given for the land. While the property has a plot of land surrounding it, the images depict mainly unkempt, vacant land. The absence of a garden or developed green space detracts from this aspect. The size is unknown. A lack of land size information further lowers the score.